Back to top.
Google-Verizon Pact: It Gets Worse

annahinks | kidskiddingkittens | nedhepburn | peterwknox | azspot

Real Net Neutrality means that Internet service providers can’t discriminate between different kinds of online content and applications. It guarantees a level playing field for all Web sites and Internet technologies. It’s what makes sure the next Google, out there in a garage somewhere, has just as good a chance as any giant corporate behemoth to find its audience and thrive online.

What Google and Verizon are proposing is fake Net Neutrality. You can read their framework for yourselfhere or go here to see Google twisting itself in knots about this suddenly “thorny issue.” But here are the basics of what the two companies are proposing:

1. Under their proposal, there would be no Net Neutrality on wireless networks — meaning anything goes, from blocking websites and applications to pay-for-priority treatment.

2. Their proposed standard for “non-discrimination” on wired networks is so weak that actions like Comcast’s widely denounced blocking of BitTorrent would be allowed.

3. The deal would let ISPs like Verizon — instead of Internet users like you — decide which applications deserve the best quality of service. That’s not the way the Internet has ever worked, and it threatens to close the door on tomorrow’s innovative applications. (If RealPlayer had been favored a few years ago, would we ever have gotten YouTube?)

4. The deal would allow ISPs to effectively split the Internet into “two pipes” — one of which would be reserved for “managed services,” a pay-for-play platform for content and applications. This is the proverbial toll road on the information superhighway, a fast lane reserved for the select few, while the rest of us are stuck on the cyber-equivalent of a winding dirt road.

5. The pact proposes to turn the Federal Communications Commission into a toothless watchdog, left fruitlessly chasing consumer complaints but unable to make rules of its own. Instead, it would leave it up to unaccountable (and almost surely industry-controlled) third parties to decide what the rules should be.

If there’s a silver lining in this whole fiasco it’s that, last I checked anyway, it wasn’t up to Google and Verizon to write the rules. That’s why we have Congress and the FCC.

Source: azspot
http://tmblr.co/ZZXmXytzpgO
  1. herdivineshadow reblogged this from nedhepburn
  2. mediation reblogged this from nedhepburn
  3. cristinaf reblogged this from d2fang
  4. youresoemo reblogged this from nedhepburn
  5. bonch reblogged this from nedhepburn
  6. silas216 reblogged this from azspot
  7. d2fang reblogged this from azspot
  8. ronbabcock reblogged this from nedhepburn and added:
    Please take a few minutes off from looking at cat videos and read up on Net Neutrality and why it’s important. At the...
  9. smashedmoet reblogged this from azspot
  10. tearsofrassilon reblogged this from smooshless and added:
    starfleeting:annahinks | kidskiddingkittens | nedhepburn | peterwknox | azspot
  11. smooshless reblogged this from starfleeting
  12. dreamhard reblogged this from nedhepburn
  13. catfacemeowmers reblogged this from nedhepburn and added:
    peterwknox:azspot:
  14. kidskiddingkittens reblogged this from nedhepburn
  15. diaryofarecoveredteenagewhore reblogged this from jesuisperdu
  16. sproutling reblogged this from nedhepburn
  17. bhav reblogged this from peterwknox
  18. jesuisperdu reblogged this from nedhepburn and added:
    Real Net Neutrality means that Internet service providers can’t discriminate between different kinds of online content...
  19. gpa1992 reblogged this from nedhepburn
  20. nedhepburn reblogged this from peterwknox
  21. peterwknox reblogged this from azspot and added:
    Real Net Neutrality means that Internet service providers can’t discriminate between different kinds of online content...